--------------- FIDO MESSAGE AREA==> TOPIC: 108 STAR TREK Ref: EBT00004 Date: 07/23/97 From: VICTORIA MACKEY Time: 10:19am \/To: WILLIAM MATTHEWS (Read 1 times) Subj: Re: The Next Movie WM> I just read an articale that stated that the new Movie WM> maybe a 40 minute length film that is released for IMAX WM> theatres only. The IMAX project is not STIX, but a seperate movie being made. STIX is slated to begin production early next year with a November 1998 release date, the last I heard. Victoria Aeron Mackey --- Maximus 2.02 * Origin: ArcticNet (1:138/34) --------------- FIDO MESSAGE AREA==> TOPIC: 108 STAR TREK Ref: EBU00000 Date: 07/24/97 From: ALAN PRESLEY Time: 03:07pm \/To: WILLIAM MATTHEWS (Read 1 times) Subj: Re: The Next Movie On <22 Jul, 14:28>, William Matthews wrote to All : WM> I just read an articale that stated that the new Movie maybe a 40 minute WM> length film that is released for IMAX theatres only. WM> WM> Soth13 WM> --- CNet/3 WM> * Origin: Wasteland City BBS IGH Mn {612/455-1235} (1:282/1044) WM> SEEN-BY: 133/2 1023 3001 5012 370/50 396/1 2320/38 3616/20 I just heard that in the next movie Data dies of andriod AIDS that he got rom the Borg queen. - Pedit Ver 2.5 --- ProBoard v2.16 [Reg] * Origin: Ye Olde Coffee House, Athens, GA, USA (1:370/50) --------------- FIDO MESSAGE AREA==> TOPIC: 108 STAR TREK Ref: EBU00001 Date: 07/24/97 From: ALAN PRESLEY Time: 03:10pm \/To: OWEN E. OULTON (Read 1 times) Subj: Re: The Next Movie On <23 Jul, 10:44>, Owen E. Oulton wrote to William Matthews : OEO> WM> I just read an articale that stated that the new Movie OEO> WM> maybe a 40 minute length film that is released for IMAX OEO> WM> theatres only. OEO> OEO> Different thing. There will also be a regular theatrical movie due out OEO> in November '98. Patrick Stewart and Brent Spiner have been signed, and OEO> Frakes will direct. OEO> OEO> The IMAX movie is a separate project. No announcement has been made of OEO> which cast will be in it. OEO> OEO> CFN, O OEO> OEO> --- Maximus 2.01wb OEO> * Origin: Pandora's Box, Ottawa, Ont. 613-829-1209 (1:243/45) OEO> SEEN-BY: 133/2 1023 3001 5012 370/50 396/1 2320/38 3616/20 OEO> They need to make another movie with the origonal crew. TNG just isn't the same. - Pedit Ver 2.5 --- ProBoard v2.16 [Reg] * Origin: Ye Olde Coffee House, Athens, GA, USA (1:370/50) --------------- FIDO MESSAGE AREA==> TOPIC: 108 STAR TREK Ref: EBU00002 Date: 07/24/97 From: AL KAISER Time: 05:26pm \/To: WILLIAM MATTHEWS (Read 1 times) Subj: Re: The Next Movie On the way to Z'ha'dum William Matthews wrote .. WM >I just read an articale that stated that the new Movie maybe a 40 WM >minute length film that is released for IMAX theatres only. I reported that about 4 months or so ago before there was even an official announcement for _A_ third TNG movie. They said that there would be a movie but never announced the format. ... What the hell is the prime directive!? ..Capt Sheridan Ŀ Al Kaiser E-Mail: alk@ct1.nai.net Packet: N1API @N1API.USA.NA ___ Blue Wave/DOS v2.30 --- Renegade v5-11 Exp * Origin: Short Circuit BBS (203) 639-0555 for a REAL CHARGE (1:141/730) --------------- FIDO MESSAGE AREA==> TOPIC: 108 STAR TREK Ref: EBU00003 Date: 07/24/97 From: CHRISTOPHER TARANA Time: 12:05am \/To: BILL NICHOLS (Read 1 times) Subj: Re: More Canons! -=> Quoting BILL NICHOLS to CHRISTOPHER TARANA <=- BN> Not really, since it was the main thrust of my original comment, BN> no. };) Huh? BN> Exactly, which is why the novels should never be assumed to take BN> precedence over the show itself. And unfortunately, a lot of BN> people feel they should, which is why we have conflicts so often. Well, we could always apply the IDIC factor to them. If that fails beam them overboard and hit the "Next Message" key and move on. BN> Quite agree. But as noted, sooner or later you get people who'll BN> tell you that i the two conflict, then it's the novels that are BN> right & the show that isn't. That's hardly the most intelligent BN> way of looking at it. No, because it has to be all or nothing. Either we accept the fact that everyone has a different POV and all are equally correct in their world view, or we learn nothing and bang our collective heads on the bulkhead (get it?). BN> Perzactly. Gooood! Progress. Now we can work up to Ugh! and Oog! at the same time! BN> which is an extremely narrow-minded POV. They're not _willing_ BN> to recognize they should be subjective about it. We can see that BN> & they can't, which is where the problem arises. That's exactly the same problem that got the Rihannsu in trouble. Can't see the forest for the trees! Christopher ... Two most common elements in the universe: Hydrogen & Stupidity. --- PCBoard/2 15.30 * Origin: The 128th Parallel Seminole,Fl 28.8k 813/397-1339 (1:3603/210) --------------- FIDO MESSAGE AREA==> TOPIC: 108 STAR TREK Ref: EBV00000 Date: 07/25/97 From: RITA SMITH Time: 06:37am \/To: OWEN E. OULTON (Read 1 times) Subj: Starship Speeds -=> Quoting Owen E. Oulton to Rita Smith <=- > Long time no type. How are things with you? Waiting eagerly for the > premieres of the next seasons of DS9 and VGR? I know *I* am... Yes, Im looking forward to the new season. Although, I'm not in rerun hell like some people. I'm catching all the episodes I missed during the regular season. TTYL Rita --- FMail 0.98+/RA 2.02+ * Origin: IKV_War_Shuttle_Tortuous_Gauntlet (1:205/1701.5) --------------- FIDO MESSAGE AREA==> TOPIC: 108 STAR TREK Ref: EBV00001 Date: 07/25/97 From: RITA SMITH Time: 06:40am \/To: TARIQ ABDEL-RAZAQ (Read 1 times) Subj: This echo...Just wonderin -=> Quoting Tariq Abdel-razaq to David Allan<=- > DA> Is this echo solely for discussion of the first/original S T series? > Nope, Trek is for Star Trek in general. All series and movies. Don't forget books, as well. TTYL Rita --- FMail 0.98+/RA 2.02+ * Origin: IKV_War_Shuttle_Tortuous_Gauntlet (1:205/1701.5) --------------- FIDO MESSAGE AREA==> TOPIC: 108 STAR TREK Ref: EBV00002 Date: 07/25/97 From: RITA SMITH Time: 06:43am \/To: EUGENE TANG (Read 1 times) Subj: Starship Speeds -=> Quoting Eugene Tang to Rita Smith <=- >>> BTW What exactly does "CFN, O" mean? I know it's how Owen E. >> >>It means "Chow For Now, Owen". > Ciao For Now? Ciao For Niao. I think we've come full circle. :) TTYL Rita --- FMail 0.98+/RA 2.02+ * Origin: IKV_War_Shuttle_Tortuous_Gauntlet (1:205/1701.5) --------------- FIDO MESSAGE AREA==> TOPIC: 108 STAR TREK Ref: EBV00003 Date: 07/25/97 From: VICTORIA MACKEY Time: 10:36am \/To: ALAN PRESLEY (Read 1 times) Subj: Re: The Next Movie AP> I just heard that in the next movie Data dies of AP> andriod AIDS that he got from Not funny. Victoria Aeron Mackey --- Maximus 2.02 * Origin: ArcticNet (1:138/34) --------------- FIDO MESSAGE AREA==> TOPIC: 108 STAR TREK Ref: EBV00004 Date: 07/25/97 From: BILL NICHOLS Time: 11:21am \/To: JAY P. HAILEY (Read 1 times) Subj: & timing JPH>BN>And at that point there's no common frame of relative reference, JPH>BN>so if we're talking about a supposedly common basic subject we then JPH>BN>end up talking at cross-purposes, which can't possibly work. ;) JPH> Why not? We're doing fine now! JPH> This whole idea that we *must* a common frame of reference JPH> misses the point of what I was posting. If we need one, we can whip JPH> one up. It doesn't have to be there all the time, and it can be JPH> temporary. Secondly there is *nothing* in your frame of reference JPH> that I have to consider binding. Would work for me -- otherwise I'd probably just have to shoot you. JPH>BN>Nope, what I said was that some people take their _own_ version of JPH>BN>Trek as the One True Trek over everyone else's -- somewhat large JPH>BN>difference there. };) JPH> Not quite. If some one, like the hypothetical Poster Pinky says JPH> that his Trek is the One True Trek, then there's aboslutely *nothing* JPH> he can do to make this so, so let him say as often as he wants. You JPH> keep missing this point. Listen carefully. Nope, I'd caught it, all right. ;) It's just that if he holds that as his personal FOR & then tries to use that to dictate to the various realities held by other folks, conflict ensues. What I said & what you inferred I said I said are different. My point is what would result from his seeing his reality & being an ass about it, as opposed to merely his seeing his reality - that's the difference: the FOR combined with the attitude as opposed to simply the attitude by itself. ;) JPH> Pinky says "This is the one true Trek." Then that doesn't matter. JPH> There is nothing he can do to back this up. Period. Back it up, no, but scream & holler & therefore cause de facto trouble on the echoes with the people who _don't_ ignore him, yes, which IYR was my core point from the beginning. :) JPH> We are free to ignore him. I recommend this course. If everyone could, conflict'd = 0, I quite agree. But prima facie everyone doesn't, & thus QED. }:) JPH> To say that there *must* be a frame of reference says that JPH> Poster Pinky = Wrong and that Bill Nichols = Right. This is more or JPH> less exactly what Poster Pinky just screamed about himself. Your one JPH> true Trek isn't any better than his because there is no one true trek. JPH> Now you say that this isn't what you're saying. Technically JPH> true, but when you say that Poster Pinky is *wrong* then that implies Nope, never said that, nor even implied it. PP was your creation, not mine; I wasn't even talking to him, remember? }};) JPH> that there must be a *right* out there somewhere. Then you use JPH> as a way to define it. I did?? When did this happen & why wasn't I told?! I did in fact say that the basics in everyone's Trek must coincide or else there'd be conflict about it, but that's about all I said. };) --- * OLXWin 1.00b * Some people don't have a clue as to what's going on. * wcGATE 4.1 = FidoNet: The Right Note! 502-452-1453 Music Oriented BBS --- GEcho/32 1.20/Pro * Origin: Modem Addictus BBS Decatur,GA 404-321-9037 (1:133/1023)