--------------- FIDO MESSAGE AREA==> TOPIC: 259 HAYES MODEMS Ref: DD400000 Date: 09/02/96 From: LLOYD BUCHFINCK Time: 08:37am \/To: SHEILA LENNON (Read 1 times) Subj: RE:Sysop program? On Aug 30, 1996 12:13am, SHEILA LENNON wrote to HAYES REPS: SL> Does Hayes still have a sysop program? SL> The Web site came up empty about it. At One ISP Con in San Francisco they said they had one! Try 404-441-1617 Regards Lloyd ... The Bear's Den Cary, NC 919-319-9132 --- Platinum Xpress/Win/Wildcat5! v2.0GI * Origin: The Bear's Den Cary, NC 919-319-9132 (1:3641/245) --------------- FIDO MESSAGE AREA==> TOPIC: 259 HAYES MODEMS Ref: DD400001 Date: 09/02/96 From: LEE GIBLING Time: 01:56pm \/To: MANNY WISE (Read 1 times) Subj: ESP CARD... Hi Manny... -> -> Do you want to sell your "spare" dual port card ??? Everything's for sale.... Make me an offer? Lee --- Platinum Xpress/Wildcat! v1.2j * Origin: The House of Ill Compute : 01702 584337 (2:257/152) --------------- FIDO MESSAGE AREA==> TOPIC: 259 HAYES MODEMS Ref: DD400002 Date: 09/01/96 From: RICHARD TOWN Time: 01:13pm \/To: JIM PALMER (Read 1 times) Subj: Re: FACTORS AFFECTING THR -=> Quoting Jim Palmer to Richard Town <=- JP> 230,400 bps serial communications are no problem on any PowerMac, RT> How does one lock a serial port at that speed? JP> V.34 modems support 230,400. (Those who have 'tweaked' V.42bis for 8 JP> to 1 compression) The Mac uses the Zilog 8530 SSC for serial, not the JP> National Semiconductor 16650AFN, the best UART chip for PC's. Thanx for the info. But I don't know of any transmission speed that will support 8: 1 compression on the fly. 1X30.TST is the ITU(t) recognised test file for testing this, (FReq TEST from origin 7pm-7am London time, I'm in Win3.11 otherwise at max 57k6) and produces here: ---------- Sat 01 Jul 95, FD 2.12.SW + 0:22:03 Event 0-@ - 0:22:06 Preparing outbound mail + 0:22:34 Calling Dayze of Futures Past, 1:106/2001, 00-1-713-458-0237 = 0:22:55 CONNECT 21600/ARQ/LAPM/V42BIS + 0:22:57 Dayze of Futures Past Systems, 1:106/2001 ~ 0:22:57 AKA: 81:202/3, 85:842/115 ~ 0:22:57 SysOp: Craig Ford ~ 0:22:57 Using: BinkleyTerm 2.59 : 0:22:57 Tranx: 2FF4955E / 2FF4417F ~ 0:22:57 Site: TWO-ston, Texas USA (WAY TO GO ROCKETS!) ~ 0:22:57 Flags: 33600,CM,XA,V42B,V32B,H16,V32T,VFC,V34,V34+,FAX,OS2 ~ 0:22:57 Phone: +1 713 458 0237 0:22:57 sType: EMSI * 0:22:58 Sent C:\BBS\FD\OUTBOUND\006A07D1.REQ; 10b, 5 CPS * 0:24:31 Rcvd C:\BBS\FD\INBOUND\1X30.TST; 983040b, 10685 CPS + 0:24:43 Mail transfer completed $ 0:24:43 To 1:106/2001, 1:48, 88. and ---------- Sat 31 Aug 96, FD 2.12.SW + 0:49:58 Event 0-@ - 0:50:04 Preparing outbound mail = 0:50:06 RING2 = 0:50:20 CONNECT 28800/ARQ/LAPM/V42BIS 0:50:21 EMSI Recv: Sent EMSI_REQ 0:50:21 EMSI Recv: Received "EMSI_DAT0105" 0:50:21 EMSI Recv: Fetching EMSI_DAT packet, 261b 0:50:21 EMSI Recv: EMSI_DAT packet OK 0:50:21 EMSI Recv: Sent EMSI_ACK + 0:50:21 TERMINATE Mail System, 2:251/31 private point ~ 0:50:21 AKA: Private points ~ 0:50:21 SysOp: NDA ~ 0:50:21 Using: Terminate 4.00/Expired_116_days_NDA : 0:50:21 Tranx: 32278C4C / 32278BCC ~ 0:50:21 Site: Alton, Hants, England ~ 0:50:21 Flags: XA ~ 0:50:21 Phone: NDA 0:50:21 sType: EMSI 0:50:21 EMSI Send: Sending EMSI_DAT 0:50:22 EMSI Send: EMSI_DAT response="EMSI_ACKA490" 0:50:22 EMSI Send: EMSI_DAT acknowledged * 0:50:23 Rcvd C:\BBS\FD\INBOUND\00FE00EB.REQ; 382b, 0 CPS % 0:50:31 FREQ: TEST * 1:08:07 Sent C:\BBS\FD\FILES\1X30.TST; 983040b, 10922 CPS + 1:08:12 Mail transfer completed $ 1:08:12 From 2:251/31.Private point, 17:52, 0. Are you really saying that this file (let's keep to the same standard) will achieve a faster apparent effective thruput just because your serial port/modem can work at 230k4? If so, then that would be news to Joe F. at Skokie who reports: -------------------------------------------------------- Speed | 1X30.TST | 2X10.TST | 3X06.TST | 4X04.TST | 5X16.TST | --------------------------------------------------------------- 14400 | 10077 | 3974 | 2339 | 1710 | 6107 | 16800 | 10867 | 4635 | 2724 | 1996 | 7117 | 19200 | 10959 | 5260 | 3096 | 2283 | 8062 | 21600 | 10972 | 5983 | 3502 | 2565 | 9125 | 24000 | 10980 | 6635 | 3899 | 2851 | 10121 | 26400 | 10987 | 7153 | 4191 | 3135 | 10318 | 28800 | 10980 | 7737 | 4571 | 3414 | 10443 | 31200*| 10994 | 8414 | 4964 | 3700 | 10654 | 33600*| 10954 | 8904 | 5279 | 3983 | 10701 | --------------------------------------------------------------- Modem Setup: Courier 7/5/95 firmware, AT&F1 init Transmitting System: DSZ.EXE version 6/7/95, on a 386DX-33. Receiving System: Procomm Plus (DOS) version 2.01, on a 486SX-25. Transfer Protocol: Ymodem-G Or even with a 244byte LAP-M frame size, V34+ and SREJ only some 32cps off what I achieve with 128byte no SREJ and vanilla V34 using real POTS. Do you have any log extracts showing this file being transmitted any serially faster via POTS? rgdZ Richard --- FMail/386 1.02 * Origin: PackLink - Home of Zoom_Modem +441812972486 (2:254/235) --------------- FIDO MESSAGE AREA==> TOPIC: 259 HAYES MODEMS Ref: DD400003 Date: 09/04/96 From: MICHAEL DUNNE Time: 12:44pm \/To: ALL (Read 1 times) Subj: Initialisation Strings I own a Hayes Optima 28.8 v.34/v.FC + Fax Modem it seems that I am having Heaps of problems with OverRun errors and Timeouts and Lost info. I dont have an Initialisation String yet but I would Just like to know if anyone could Help me organise one that FORCES 28.8 operation with NO fallback and good error correction etc If ANYONE can help me Please HELP I am at wits end with being Disconnected etc all the time. Thanks In Advance Michael Dunne --- Maximus/2 3.01 * Origin: Far Northern News (28.8K) - Cairns, Tropical North Qld (3:640/531) --------------- FIDO MESSAGE AREA==> TOPIC: 259 HAYES MODEMS Ref: DD500000 Date: 09/04/96 From: CRAIG FORD Time: 06:49am \/To: RICHARD TOWN (Read 1 times) Subj: FACTORS AFFECTING THR Richard Town wrote the following to Jim Palmer, and I quote (in part): RT> Thanx for the info. But I don't know of any transmission speed RT> that will support 8: 1 compression on the fly. One can easily exceed that using D/GSZ's RLE mode for suitably redudndant data. RT> 1X30.TST is the ITU(t) recognised test file for testing this, .....snip, snip.... RT> Are you really saying that this file (let's keep to the same RT> standard) will achieve a faster apparent effective thruput just RT> because your serial port/modem can work at 230k4? Absolutely! One should achieve a transfer rate roughly equivalent to DTE/10 when transferring the file. RT> If so, then that would be news to Joe F. at Skokie who reports: RT> -------------------------------------------------------- RT> Speed | 1X30.TST | 2X10.TST | 3X06.TST | 4X04.TST | 5X16.TST | RT> --------------------------------------------------------------- RT> 14400 | 10077 | 3974 | 2339 | 1710 | 6107 | RT> 16800 | 10867 | 4635 | 2724 | 1996 | 7117 | RT> 19200 | 10959 | 5260 | 3096 | 2283 | 8062 | RT> 21600 | 10972 | 5983 | 3502 | 2565 | 9125 | RT> 24000 | 10980 | 6635 | 3899 | 2851 | 10121 | RT> 26400 | 10987 | 7153 | 4191 | 3135 | 10318 | RT> 28800 | 10980 | 7737 | 4571 | 3414 | 10443 | RT> 31200*| 10994 | 8414 | 4964 | 3700 | 10654 | RT> 33600*| 10954 | 8904 | 5279 | 3983 | 10701 |