--------------- FIDO MESSAGE AREA==> TOPIC: 258 CHANNELING Ref: E2C00016 Date: 02/07/97 From: UUCP Time: 05:30am \/To: ALL (Read 0 times) Subj: From: Newsgroups: lt.paranormal.channeling,alt.paranormal.forteana,alt.paranormal.p ramid,alt.paranormal.spells.hexes.magic,alt.parenting.solutions,a t.parenting.spanking,alt.parenting.twins-triplets,alt.parents-tee Original Date: From: aphillips@sunbelt.net (Andrew A. Phillips) Distribution: world Subject: Scanning, Graphic Desgin & Layout, Printing, OCR'ing!!! Organization: Eclipse Graphix Reply-To: aphillips@sunbelt.net X-Newsreader: EmTec News for OS/2 [version: 4.6b UNREGISTERED 28 days remaining] Lines: 8 NNTP-Posting-Host: 208.147.218.31 Message-ID: <32fa31cd.0@204.71.8.22> Date: 6 Feb 97 19:32:29 GMT Path: shore!uunet!in3.uu.net!206.229.87.25!news.sprintlink.net!news-peer.sprintlink. n et!howland.erols.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!204.71.8.22!208.147.218.31 Xref: shore alt.paranormal.channeling:9719 alt.parenting.solutions:31089 alt.parenting.spanking:19522 alt.parents-teens:24843 alt.parents.analretentive.insane:178 alt.party:11072 Do you need scanned images, graphic design and layouts, OCR, printing???? If so then come and visit Eclipse Graphix's HomePage at: http://www.augusta.net/~aphillips/eclipsegraphix/index.html --- MailGate 0.25e * Origin: Ask your Fido Feed for I_UFO (1:330/201.1) --------------- FIDO MESSAGE AREA==> TOPIC: 258 CHANNELING Ref: E2C00017 Date: 02/07/97 From: CLEWIS@FERRET.OCUNIX.ON.C Time: 05:30am \/To: ALL (Read 0 times) Subj: cmsg cancel <32f9714d.0@nt.dave-world.ne05:30:0002/07/97 From: clewis@ferret.ocunix.on.ca Newsgroups: alt.paranormal.channeling Original Date: 6 Feb 1997 17:48:22 EST EMP/ECP (aka SPAM) cancelled by clewis@ferret.ocunix.on.ca. See news.admin.net-abuse.announce, report 19970206.31 for further details --- MailGate 0.25e * Origin: Ask your Fido Feed for I_UFO (1:330/201.1) --------------- FIDO MESSAGE AREA==> TOPIC: 258 CHANNELING Ref: E2C00018 Date: 02/07/97 From: MICHAEL MARTIN-SMITH Time: 05:30am \/To: ALL (Read 0 times) Subj: Re: Apollo Moon Landings Faked Propogand05:30:0002/07/97 Reply-to: NNTP-Posting-Host: From: "Michael Martin-Smith" Newsgroups: lt.misc.forteana,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.canada,soc.cultur .usa,alt.usa-sucks,alt.conspiracy,alt.nuke.the.USA,alt.government abuse,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranormal,alt.paranet.ufo,uk.media. Organization: seldom-if-ever Original Date: Fri, 7 Feb 1997 00:24:45 +0000 In article <32F9A97F.48C6@ug.ee.ed.ac.uk>, Stewart Smith writes >Robert Casey wrote: >> >> The word is "TROLL" or TROLLING". A stupid or silly posting done to >> get the newsgroup all riled up, possibly done to get a flame war >> going. > >Well it's done something the traffic here is about 3-400 percent up on >yesterday which is a paranormal event anyway on here. Just for the >record I tend to believe that if the conditions for photography were as >bad as they were described in the FT then maybe one mission (Appolo 6 >wasn't it?) did come back without any decent pictures and they ended up >faking a few to cover their uselessness. > >Stew Several Saturn 5's were seen heading upwards into the sky by thousands of people, live at Cape Kennedy. Thousands of technicians attended the vehicles as they were prepared - Command modules,rocket stages, crew etc. Many would doubtless have noticed that 3 men got into the Apollo capsule , went up into the sky under a gigantic fireball, and disappeared from view. Would the then Soviet Union not have loved to reveal that no US spacecraft left orbit on their tracking screens? Was Jodrell Bank in on the conspiracy? I don't believe that Sir Bernard Lovell was bought off, or Kettering Grammar school, who uncovered many Soviet secrets and failures i that period.The crews then came back 9-12 days later, carrying at least several tens of kilos of rock without touching Earth in the intervening period; where did the rock come from, and why are the minerals not easily identifiable as terrestrial minerals, eg the orange "genesis rock" or the totally anhydous regolith samples, uncontaminated by a trace of organic matter. Even Antarctic samples show evidence of life, or contact with oxygen? Scientists from many disciplines and countries have studied samples of these rocks; have they all been fooled, or were they all bought? Was Apollo roomy enough to contain 3 men and a sterilizer big enough to "cook" over 100 lbs of rock to that extent. If they orbited the Earth for a few days and came back without going to the Moon, someone must have pre-filled Apollo with all this junk; after 25 years, has no one sold his story to the Press yet? It would require a roomful of X-files in itself to explain away that violation of human nature! Maybe I'm being too simple, but surely the Fortean Times is primarily a vehicle of entertainment, not scholarship. There are enough people in Congress/Government who would love to debunk or kill the Space progamme for Budgetary reasons, who would have access to such a cover-up - if it existed; surely by now they could have blown it wide open, and put an end to the myth of "America's glorious days of Apollo". The space effort would never survive the laughter, and billions could be excised from the budget. Times have changed, as we keep hearing; there is , for many people, no propaganda value in having gone to the Moon, so why keep up such an elaborate pretence? Maybe all the above is not proof absolute, but it is a lot easier to believe than the alternative. NO, JFK WAS shot; Elvis, and Mao Tse Tung ARE truly dead; and Martin Bormann is not teaching Sunday school in Bolivia, and Adolf Hitler was not a Zionist conspirator. Apollo DID go to the Moon! -- Michael Martin-Smith --- MailGate 0.25e * Origin: Ask your Fido Feed for I_UFO (1:330/201.1) --------------- FIDO MESSAGE AREA==> TOPIC: 258 CHANNELING Ref: E2C00019 Date: 02/07/97 From: LOU MINATTI Time: 05:30am \/To: ALL (Read 0 times) Subj: Re: Have you ever felt like you were pos05:30:0002/07/97 Reply-to: "slaroche"@[spamsnip]concentric.net From: "Lou Minatti" <"slaroche"@[spamsnip]concentric.net> Newsgroups: lt.mind.bending,alt.out-of-body,alt.paranet.metaphysics,alt.paran t.paranormal,alt.paranet.psi,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.paranormal,alt.p ranormal.channeling,alt.paranormal.crop-circles,alt.paranormal.py Organization: Commercial emailers read disclaimer below Original Date: Thu, 06 Feb 1997 20:39:50 -0800 Susan Elaine wrote: > > Have you ever felt like you were possessed by an ANGEL? No. > Walk with me... I'll pass. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- HOT ALIEN JPEGS: http://www.concentric.net/~Slaroche/HOMEPAGE3.HTM (By sending me unsolicited commercial email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions as listed here: http://www.concentric.net/~Slaroche/SPAM.HTM) --- MailGate 0.25e * Origin: Ask your Fido Feed for I_UFO (1:330/201.1) --------------- FIDO MESSAGE AREA==> TOPIC: 258 CHANNELING Ref: E2C00020 Date: 02/07/97 From: ANGUS Time: 05:30am \/To: ALL (Read 0 times) Subj: Re: Apollo Moon Landings Faked Propogand05:30:0002/07/97 Reply-to: angus@utech.net From: "angus" Newsgroups: lt.misc.forteana,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.canada,soc.cultur .usa,alt.usa-sucks,alt.conspiracy,alt.nuke.the.USA,alt.government abuse,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranormal,alt.paranet.ufo,uk.media. Organization: Klingons are us Original Date: Thu, 06 Feb 1997 17:34:42 -0800 John Higgs wrote: > > Hi Bo, > > There has been an in-depth debate about Percy's 'findings' in > alt.misc.forteana a month or so back - you'll be able to find the > postings in www.dejanews.com. > > I think a fair summation would be that the evidence that NASA did land > on the moon is overwhelming, and that there are serious flaws in a > number of Percy's arguments. However, there is still the nagging > suspicion that, due to a number of 'staged'-looking pictures or pictures > with apparent multiple light sources, NASA did stage some of the photos > on Earth. > Another silly arguement about the moon landings. Lets see, multiple light sourses. (1) The sun (2) Light off the camera (3) Lights off the lander (4) Lights off the rover (5) Lights off sourses of lumination astronauts carried with them or were on the suit. THINK people. Angus --- MailGate 0.25e * Origin: Ask your Fido Feed for I_UFO (1:330/201.1) --------------- FIDO MESSAGE AREA==> TOPIC: 258 CHANNELING Ref: E2C00021 Date: 02/07/97 From: ROBERT CASEY Time: 05:30am \/To: ALL (Read 0 times) Subj: Re: Apollo Moon Landings Faked Propogand05:30:0002/07/97 From: "Robert Casey" Newsgroups: lt.misc.forteana,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.canada,soc.cultur .usa,alt.usa-sucks,alt.conspiracy,alt.nuke.the.USA,alt.government abuse,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranormal,alt.paranet.ufo,uk.media. Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest) Original Date: Fri, 7 Feb 1997 04:26:23 GMT In article <32FA86B2.7CBF@utech.net> angus@utech.net writes: >John Higgs wrote: >> >> Hi Bo, >> >> There has been an in-depth debate about Percy's 'findings' in >> alt.misc.forteana a month or so back - you'll be able to find the >> postings in www.dejanews.com. >> >> I think a fair summation would be that the evidence that NASA did land >> on the moon is overwhelming, and that there are serious flaws in a >> number of Percy's arguments. However, there is still the nagging >> suspicion that, due to a number of 'staged'-looking pictures or pictures >> with apparent multiple light sources, NASA did stage some of the photos >> on Earth. >> > >Another silly arguement about the moon landings. > >Lets see, multiple light sourses. > >(1) The sun >(2) Light off the camera >(3) Lights off the lander >(4) Lights off the rover >(5) Lights off sourses of lumination astronauts carried with them or >were on the suit. > (6) lots of light bouncing off the lunar ground towards the photographed astronaut. "Moonlight" very close up. --- MailGate 0.25e * Origin: Ask your Fido Feed for I_UFO (1:330/201.1) --------------- FIDO MESSAGE AREA==> TOPIC: 258 CHANNELING Ref: E2D00000 Date: 02/07/97 From: GSERONIK@DIRECT.CA Time: 09:33am \/To: ALL (Read 0 times) Subj: Re: Apollo Moon Landings Faked Propogand09:33:0002/07/97 From: gseronik@direct.ca Newsgroups: lt.misc.forteana,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.canada,soc.cultur .usa,alt.usa-sucks,alt.conspiracy,alt.nuke.the.USA,alt.government abuse,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranormal,alt.paranet.ufo,uk.media. Organization: Canada Internet Direct, Inc. Original Date: Fri, 07 Feb 1997 04:54:04 GMT angus wrote: >John Higgs wrote: >> >> Hi Bo, >> >> There has been an in-depth debate about Percy's 'findings' in >> alt.misc.forteana a month or so back - you'll be able to find the >> postings in www.dejanews.com. >> >> I think a fair summation would be that the evidence that NASA did land >> on the moon is overwhelming, and that there are serious flaws in a >> number of Percy's arguments. However, there is still the nagging >> suspicion that, due to a number of 'staged'-looking pictures or pictures >> with apparent multiple light sources, NASA did stage some of the photos >> on Earth. >> > >Another silly arguement about the moon landings. > >Lets see, multiple light sourses. > >(1) The sun >(2) Light off the camera >(3) Lights off the lander >(4) Lights off the rover >(5) Lights off sourses of lumination astronauts carried with them or >were on the suit. > > >THINK people. Ah Angus, you don't have to think even that hard. The pictures that I've seen that show this were OBVIOUSLY taken in rehearsals with a LEM mockup and a simulated lunar surface. These are genuine fakes - pictures of events that actually happened but the event photographed is a rehearsal. Claiming these disprove that NASA got astronauts to the Moon is like using pictures of the astronauts rehearsing in the neutral buoyancy tank as proof the Shuttle has never been in orbit. Ooops, maybe I shouldn't have mentioned that last bit... Regards, Gary in Vancouver --- MailGate 0.25e * Origin: Ask your Fido Feed for I_UFO (1:330/201.1) --------------- FIDO MESSAGE AREA==> TOPIC: 258 CHANNELING Ref: E2D00001 Date: 02/07/97 From: JARLE NYGRD Time: 02:28pm \/To: ALL (Read 0 times) Subj: TESP From: "Jarle Nygrd" Newsgroups: lt.alien,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.paran ormal,alt.paranormal.channeling Organization: NetPower Int. Original Date: 7 Feb 1997 14:47:48 GMT **The Encyclopedia of Supernatural Phenomena** Like Aliens? Or X-files? Or maybe you are into UFO's? Well, TESP got it all! What else is there? Well, Conspiracy and Abductions are also part of it. Images and tons of information is available FOR FREE!!! All YOU need to do is this: 1. Use IE3.0 and point it at: http://home.sol.no/arnenh/tesp 2. Do whatever you want to! 3. And please do fill in the Feedback form, located under the logo.... Greetings from outer space and Norway.... :-) Jarle Nygrd jarlen@netpower.no Ole Martin Haaland arnenh@online.no --- MailGate 0.25e * Origin: Ask your Fido Feed for I_UFO (1:330/201.1) --------------- FIDO MESSAGE AREA==> TOPIC: 258 CHANNELING Ref: E2D00002 Date: 02/07/97 From: UUCP Time: 02:28pm \/To: ALL (Read 0 times) Subj: From: Newsgroups: lt.paranormal.channeling,alt.paranormal.forteana,alt.paranormal.p ramid,alt.paranormal.spells.hexes.magic,alt.parenting.solutions,a t.parenting.spanking,alt.parenting.twins-triplets,alt.parents-tee Original Date: 7 Feb 1997 11:54:21 EST Message-ID: Control: cancel <32fa31cd.0@204.71.8.22> X-No-Archive: Yes From: clewis@ferret.ocunix.on.ca Sender: aphillips@sunbelt.net (Andrew A. Phillips) Subject: cmsg cancel <32fa31cd.0@204.71.8.22> Approved: clewis@ferret.ocunix.on.ca X-Cancelled-By: clewis@ferret.ocunix.on.ca Lines: 3 EMP/ECP (aka SPAM) cancelled by clewis@ferret.ocunix.on.ca. See news.admin.net-abuse.announce, report 19970207.05 for further details --- MailGate 0.25e * Origin: Ask your Fido Feed for I_UFO (1:330/201.1)