--------------- FIDO MESSAGE AREA==> TOPIC: 115 RUSH LIMBAUGH Ref: F3E00001 Date: 03/05/98 From: WAYNE CROW Time: 11:29am \/To: ROBERT PLETT (Read 0 times) Subj: Dufus' Waterloo? RP>Gosh, Joanne, that's bein' kinda hard on women, ain't it? - I know RP>they're out there, but I've yet to encounter the woman who could stand RP>the thought of intimacy with him, much less actually be attracted by RP>him. Hey Robert, wasn't they a poll here while aback when this whole thing first started stating that they (the people) didn't trust "his word" or thought that was wasn't been truthful about the whole "Whitegate" thing. Wayne --- QMPro 1.53 Blonde Klingons: Because is was a good day to die * Origin: Trafalgar - OS/2 in B'ham 252-3112 (1:3602/1805) --------------- FIDO MESSAGE AREA==> TOPIC: 115 RUSH LIMBAUGH Ref: F3E00002 Date: 03/05/98 From: WAYNE CROW Time: 11:29am \/To: DAVID HARTUNG (Read 0 times) Subj: Dufus' Waterloo? DH> John, I have question, there have been reports that Linda Tripp DH> violated Maryland law by making these recordings. Can you shed any DH> light on this? Is Linda Tripp also in legal hot water? I saw several news reports on that. She could be, however, I believe the Maryland DA will turn it over to some federal prosecutor who will in turn will make a deal for her regarding the Clinton Scandal. Wayne ILK Member wcrow@zebra.net --- QMPro 1.53 #0n++h+N AC hanks for hanging up, dear. * Origin: Trafalgar - OS/2 in B'ham 252-3112 (1:3602/1805) --------------- FIDO MESSAGE AREA==> TOPIC: 115 RUSH LIMBAUGH Ref: F3E00003 Date: 03/05/98 From: WAYNE CROW Time: 11:29am \/To: MARK FORNOFF (Read 0 times) Subj: Dufus' Waterloo? MF>????? ROTFLMBO Wayne wcrow@zebra.net ILK MEMBER P.S. -> I'm back.. --- QMPro 1.53 It's not hard to meet expenses, they're everywhere. * Origin: Trafalgar - OS/2 in B'ham 252-3112 (1:3602/1805) --------------- FIDO MESSAGE AREA==> TOPIC: 115 RUSH LIMBAUGH Ref: F3E00004 Date: 03/05/98 From: WAYNE CROW Time: 11:29am \/To: ALL (Read 0 times) Subj: Executive Privilage I heard on the national news (ABC carried at the top of the news, NBC waited to nearly last to mention it) that the Mr. Clintoon may invoke Executive Privilege regarding any questions that Mr. Starr would make toward Clinton's aides. Do you think he'll do this? I believe he will because to me, he's got too much to lose in this. Wayne wcrow@zebra.net --- QMPro 1.53 Soon To Be A Major Motion Picture. * Origin: Trafalgar - OS/2 in B'ham 252-3112 (1:3602/1805) --------------- FIDO MESSAGE AREA==> TOPIC: 115 RUSH LIMBAUGH Ref: F3E00005 Date: 03/05/98 From: WAYNE CROW Time: 11:29am \/To: JOANNE JOHNSON (Read 0 times) Subj: Dufus' Waterloo? JJ>If Clinton was a Republican and the Congress had a Democratic JJ>majority...Clinton would have been impreached long ago. JJ>If Packwood was a Democrat, he would still be in congress. I'll agree to that 100 percent. For that matter if it had been a Republican official (President or Senator) he would be out on his keister.. Wayne wcrow@zebra.net --- QMPro 1.53 Dogs come when you call. Cats have answering machines. * Origin: Trafalgar - OS/2 in B'ham 252-3112 (1:3602/1805) --------------- FIDO MESSAGE AREA==> TOPIC: 115 RUSH LIMBAUGH Ref: F3E00006 Date: 03/08/98 From: ROBERT PLETT Time: 11:30am \/To: JOHN SAMPSON (Read 0 times) Subj: Re: Dufus' Waterloo? On 03-07-98, JOHN SAMPSON declared to MIKE ANGWIN: JS>There is one name that is conspicuously missing. That of John Kasic of JS>Ohio. He's been up in New Hampshire as well as Forbes and Alexander, JS>probing the waters so to speak. JS>Granted, it's exploratory, but he's checking to see if he has a chance. If JS>he decides he does, look for him to get into the race. I seriously doubt he'd get far. Bob /\-/\ - proud Ilk homebody@galstar.com C.A.T. ( o o ) Chapter Ilks == ^ == Green Country - Oklahoma http://www.galstar.com/~homebody/ * SLMR 2.1a * And behold, I am coming quickly - Rev 22:7 * Origin: Shadow of The Cat (1:170/1701.10) --------------- FIDO MESSAGE AREA==> TOPIC: 115 RUSH LIMBAUGH Ref: F3E00007 Date: 03/09/98 From: LARRY GAULT Time: 06:08pm \/To: MARK FORNOFF (Read 0 times) Subj: Re: Dufus' Waterloo? MF> You'll forgive me if I hope you're wrong, but then there's also what MF> David Wilkerson, Billy Graham and others have said about the US. I MF> don't have the exact quote, but it was something to the effect that if MF> God does not hold America accountable for its sins, He will have to MF> apologize to Sodom and Gomorrah. Dunno too much about Billy Graham and his stances on the decline of America's moral standards after watching his interview on the tube by, I believe, Katie Couric, the other day, Mark. He came across as being fully understanding of any of clinton's...umm... shortcomings...as being entirely attributable to the "enormous pressures of the office". He iterated time and again that he didn't know that the charges were true concerning "his close personal friends" (his phraseology), even if they were, they were entirely understandable. While I don't for one minute doubt Mr. Graham's sincerity, or the message that he has brought millions over the years, I do have my problems with a man of his calling referring to an individual who could have stemmed the deaths of three thousand or so entirely innocent, seconds-away-from-viable children a year from death but didn't as a "close personal friend". Direct to you from the keyboard of Larry Gault... ... The refrigerator light DOES go off. Now let me out of here. ___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.20 [NR]-*- SF-Quick/BW 1.00r [#48] --- Alexi/Mail 2.02b (#10000) * Origin: COLUMBIA SPITFIRE * Dallas, Texas * (214-275-5040) (1:124/3271) -=> Quoting John Sampson to Walter Luffman <=- JS> I believe that it was Sam Giancanna that ran the Chicago mob. If JS> anyone has better information, let me know. If it was Sam Giancanna, JS> then there is more than a passing irony since El Presidente's idol is JS> JFK, and if we are to believe the latest information, it was Sam JS> Giancanna who, to put it in mob parlance, may have had JFK "whacked". All these coincidences! Mind you, I'm not suggesting that Bill Clinton is connected to The Mob. For that matter, I'm not even suggesting that The Mob is anything more than the product of some writers' (and prosecutors') fevered imaginations. And I'm certainly not suggesting that The Mob ever used Hillary in order to get their hooks into Der Schlickmeister! But the whole thing _does_ sound like the plot of a Mario Puzo novel, doesn't it? Walter, wluffman@usit.net CompuServe: 74721,3464 ... Life's a Hillary! ___ Blue Wave/DOS v2.30 [NR] --- Platinum Xpress/Win/Wildcat5! v2.0 * Origin: Doc's Place, Clw Fla. telnet://docsplace.dyn.ml.org (1:3603/140) --------------- FIDO MESSAGE AREA==> TOPIC: 115 RUSH LIMBAUGH Ref: F3E00008 Date: 03/08/98 From: WALTER LUFFMAN Time: 11:46pm \/To: JOHN SAMPSON (Read 0 times) Subj: A new theory -=> Quoting John Sampson to Walter Luffman <=- JS> I believe that it was Sam Giancanna that ran the Chicago mob. If JS> anyone has better information, let me know. If it was Sam Giancanna, JS> then there is more than a passing irony since El Presidente's idol is JS> JFK, and if we are to believe the latest information, it was Sam JS> Giancanna who, to put it in mob parlance, may have had JFK "whacked". All these coincidences! Mind you, I'm not suggesting that Bill Clinton is connected to The Mob. For that matter, I'm not even suggesting that The Mob is anything more than the product of some writers' (and prosecutors') fevered imaginations. And I'm certainly not suggesting that The Mob ever used Hillary in order to get their hooks into Der Schlickmeister! But the whole thing _does_ sound like the plot of a Mario Puzo novel, doesn't it? Walter, wluffman@usit.net CompuServe: 74721,3464 ... Life's a Hillary! ___ Blue Wave/DOS v2.30 [NR] --- Platinum Xpress/Win/Wildcat5! v2.0 * Origin: Doc's Place, Clw Fla. telnet://docsplace.dyn.ml.org (1:3603/140) --------------- FIDO MESSAGE AREA==> TOPIC: 115 RUSH LIMBAUGH Ref: F3E00009 Date: 03/09/98 From: WALTER LUFFMAN Time: 12:00am \/To: JOHN SAMPSON (Read 0 times) Subj: Cali, Mexico, & illegals -=> Quoting John Sampson to Walter Luffman <=- JS> I've publicly come out against the militarization of the Southern JS> Border for one very valid (IMHO) reason. What would the rules of JS> engagement be for our troops on the border? With the shooting death of JS> one Mexican boy on the border by a Marine squad doing recon work and JS> the subsequent uproar that it caused, it's painfully obvious that we JS> can't send troops to the border and seal it off. Nor should we, unless we are ready to declare either martial law along the border or war with Mexico. Soldiers are warriors, and their training is not at all similar to the training given law-enforcement officers. Even former military police personnel require some retraining before they can function as civilian LEOs. JS> As long as the ex-military are under the age of 37 when they join the JS> Border Patrol, it'll be just fine. The Civil Service law requires that JS> anyone appointed to a law enforcement position covered under the law JS> enforcement provisions of the Federal Retirement program, MUST be JS> appointed and enter on duty before their 37th birthday. The selection of that particular age is interesting. It is just below the earliest age at which a member of the Armed Forces can take a regular 20-year retirement, since no one may legally enlist before his/her seventeenth birthday. This effectively prevents military retirees from "double-dipping", and that probably was the intent. OTOH, right now the services are forcing out a lot of good people with civilian-convertible skills before they reach retirement age; most of these people _would_ be eligible under the age-37 rule. JS> However, we need not only more people on the border, but more in the JS> interior to remove those who are already here in the country. Forget JS> another "amnesty". The last one was an unqualified disaster. But JS> that's the subject of another post. No argument on the "disaster" part. And if you decide to write that other post, you can be sure I'll read it. JS> Lastly, the INS, the parent agency for the Border Patrol, is the one JS> federal agency that has experienced tremendous growth for some time JS> now. We have NOT been under the budget axe. We ARE however, under JS> scrutiny for mismanagement, and rightly so. There is a plan to disband JS> the agency and transfer the various functions to other agencies and JS> make the Border Patrol a seperate Justice Department agency. Time will JS> tell what happens. Transfer the Border Patrol to DOJ, eh? Sounds like a move to consolidate all law enforcement power under one Cabinet office -- one might even call it empire-building. I've heard a bit about mismanagement in INS, and I wouldn't be surprised by it even if I hadn't heard anything -- I _expect_ a certain degree of mismanagement in every organization, and even more so in government agencies. But I'd like to hear more. JS> The biggest complaint is the dual role the INS has. Both an JS> enforcement role and a benefit granting role which many times is at JS> odds with itself. Separating the two roles may be a good idea, or not -- I don't know enough about it to have an opinion. But in general, I think law enforcement agencies should be _only_ law enforcement agencies, with all other duties handled elsewhere. Walter, wluffman@usit.net CompuServe: 74721,3464 ... A bleeding heart can be hell on the carpeting. ___ Blue Wave/DOS v2.30 [NR] --- Platinum Xpress/Win/Wildcat5! v2.0 * Origin: Doc's Place, Clw Fla. telnet://docsplace.dyn.ml.org (1:3603/140) --------------- FIDO MESSAGE AREA==> TOPIC: 115 RUSH LIMBAUGH Ref: F3E00010 Date: 03/09/98 From: WALTER LUFFMAN Time: 03:41pm \/To: JEFF SCHLENKER (Read 0 times) Subj: Titanic Lewinsky -=> Quoting Jeff Schlenker to Michael Mcsorley <=- JS> Rush has an official website? How come he never mentions it on the JS> show? What's the URL? :) Rush does _not_ have an official website for his program, but there is one for his line of neckwear...I believe its URL is www.rushties.com. Marta has a website for her new magazine at (no "www." IIRC) ventmag.com. Rush has said that he'd like to have an official program website, and some preliminary work may have already been done. There are two problems, though: Problem 1: Rush wants a way to permit advertising on the website without affecting advertising on the radio program itself. Advertisers already know his fans (and probably detractors as well) will flock to any official website, but the cost of advertising on the World Wide Web is _much_ less (per-thousand "hits") than it is on his radio program. Problem 2: With the popularity of anything connected to Rush already well documented, it is clear that he would need much more in the way of resources than the average website. Personally, I doubt that a PC-based network connected to a T1 line would be sufficient -- it might take something more like a _big_ mainframe system and a T3 connection during peak times. Walter, wluffman@usit.net CompuServe: 74721,3464 ... Annoy Clinton: Remind him that Rush is more popular. ___ Blue Wave/DOS v2.30 [NR] --- Platinum Xpress/Win/Wildcat5! v2.0 * Origin: Doc's Place, Clw Fla. telnet://docsplace.dyn.ml.org (1:3603/140)